TOMATO "DAR ZAVOLZHYA"
RESULTS OF THE TRIALS, KRASNODAR TERRITORY, SEASON OF 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1615a/1615ac4832f4b383379472cb1b468a4da742d0c2" alt=""
Effect of test products on productivity of tomatoes
Option | Yield , dt / ha | Increase to control | |
---|---|---|---|
dt / ha | % | ||
Without treatment (control) | 215.4 | - | - |
Analog (dihydroquercetin) , 60 ml / ha | 245.8 | 30.4 | 14.1 |
Aleox Agro , 60 ml / ha | 254.6 | 39.2 | 18.2 |
Mean least difference 05 | 11.0 | - | - |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12494/12494b49a199784c2a7a1c72d41d5665a49b191f" alt=""
Method of treatment and consumption rates of Aleox Agro: - spraying of plants: 1st - at the beginning of flowering of the first bunch, 2nd and 3rd - with an interval of 10 days. Consumption of product - 60 ml / ha, working fluid flow rate - 400 l / ha
The effect of the test product on tomato plant growth
Option | Height of the plant, cm | Weight of above-ground organs, g / plant | Surface of the leaves , dm | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Raw | Dry | |||
Without treatment (control) | 57.8 | 142.14 | 40.37 | 33.11 |
Analog (dihydroquercetin) , 60 ml / ha | 65.4 | 162.18 | 48.49 | 36.14 |
Aleox Agro , 60 ml / ha | 68.9 | 166.89 | 50.07 | 37.10 |
Mean least difference 05 | 2.2 | 5.14 | 1.58 | 1.23 |
Influence of test products on the formation of tomato fruits
Option | The content in fruits | Diameter, cm | Fruit weight, g | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sugar ,% | Vitamin C, mg / 100 g of raw substance | |||
Without treatment (control) | 5.9 | 79.82 | 3.1 | 25.4 |
Analog (dihydroquercetin) , 60 ml / ha | 7.6 | 88.74 | 3.4 | 32.1 |
Aleox Agro , 60 ml / ha | 8.1 | 94.21 | 3.6 | 33.0 |
Mean least difference 05 | 0.2 | 3.05 | - | - |
GREEN PEPPER
RESULTS OF THE TRIALS, INDIA, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT, SEASON OF 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d23a5/d23a5afc2b99f9306737e0ee17ef588d829421fe" alt=""
Agricultural practice
Experimental field was maintained according to the planned agricultural practice (pest control, weeding,
fertilization, irrigation and etc.). Spraying of fertilizer Aleox Agro was performed at the stage of flowering of
green pepper. The experiment took into account both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The definition
of the latter was carried out visually. Upon completion of the trials, there were selected mature vegetables of
market size and the yield was recorded by repeated counting
Since the spraying was done at the mid-growth stage of the crop / closer to the harvesting stage -
the exact effect was not determined, but the fruit yield was %5 higher than the standard and %10
higher than the control.
Can be carried out new trials in order to get result of actual effects of the product.
Yield and physical observation
Treatment | Replication | Physical state | Yield |
---|---|---|---|
1 Aleox Agro 1 ml / l water | 1R1T | Good | 140 kg / plot |
2R1T | Good | 142 kg / plot | |
3R1T | Good | 139 kg / plot | |
T2 Standard 1ml / l | 1R1T | Good | 135 kg / plot |
2R1T | Good | 137 kg / plot | |
3R1T | Good | 133 kg / plot | |
T3 Control water spraying | 1R1T | Good | 132 kg / plot |
2R1T | Good | 128 kg / plot | |
3R1T | Good | 130 kg / plot |
CHILLI
RESULTS OF THE TFIALS, INDIA, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT, SEASON OF 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a142b/a142baa503d46c4d3a123f962ee6265e184acee6" alt="CHILLI"
Agricultural practice
Experimental field was maintained according to the planned agricultural practice (pest control, weeding,
fertilization, irrigation and etc.). Spraying of fertilizer Aleox Agro was performed at the stage of flowering of
green pepper. The experiment took into account both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The definition
of the latter was carried out visually. Upon completion of the trials, there were selected mature vegetables
of market size and the yield was recorded by repeated counting .
Since the spraying was done at the mid-growth stage of the crop / closer to the harvesting stage - the exact
effect was not determined, but the fruit yield was %6 higher than the standard and %12 higher than the
control.
Can be carried out new trials in order to get result of actual effects of the product
Yield and physical observation
Treatment | Replication | Physical state | Yield |
---|---|---|---|
ml / l water 1 Aleox Agro 1T | 1R1T | Good | 62 kg / plot |
2R1T | Good | 65 kg / plot | |
3R1T | Good | 60 kg / plot | |
T2 Standard | 1R1T | Good | 55 kg / plot |
2R1T | Good | 56 kg / plot | |
3R1T | Good | 58 kg / plot | |
T3 Control water spraying | 1R1T | Good | 50 kg / plot |
2R1T | Good | 48 kg / plot | |
3R1T | Good | 53 kg / plot |
TOMATOES
RESULTS OF THE TRIALS, INDIA, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT, SEASON OF 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44c8f/44c8f4a2632be211d0dbe4650b69b11c92dcfa09" alt="TOMATO"
Agricultural practice
Experimental field was maintained according to the planned agricultural practice (pest control, weeding,
fertilization, irrigation and etc.). Spraying of fertilizer Aleox Agro was performed at the stage of flowering
of tomato. The experiment took into account both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The definition of
the latter was carried out visually. Upon completion of the trials, there were selected mature vegetables of
market size and the yield was recorded by repeated counting
Since the spraying was done at the mid-growth stage of the crop / closer to the harvesting stage - the
exact effect was not determined, but the fruit yield was %6 higher than the standard and %15 higher
than the control.
Can be carried out new trials in order to get result of actual effects of the product.
Yield and physical observation
Treatment | Replication | Physical state | Yield |
---|---|---|---|
ml / l water 1 Aleox Agro 1T | 1R1T | Good | 62 kg / plot |
2R1T | Good | 65 kg / plot | |
3R1T | Good | 60 kg / plot | |
T2 Standard | 1R1T | Good | 55 kg / plot |
2R1T | Good | 56 kg / plot | |
3R1T | Good | 58 kg / plot | |
T3 Control water spraying | 1R1T | Good | 50 kg / plot |
2R1T | Good | 48 kg / plot | |
3R1T | Good | 53 kg / plot |
EARLY ONION «SPENISH»
RESULTS OF THE TRIALS, ASTRAKHAN REGION, SEASON OF 2017
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b606/8b606da1eb570b88bd98c90822bd81b52d6d63f8" alt="TOMATO"
Method of treatment and consumption rates of product:
- Control, without the use of Aleox Agro;
- BI, with irrigation water through the drip irrigation system: 1 st - in the full germination phase, 2 - in the
phase of 6-5 leaves, 3rd - 14 days after the second application, product consumption - 200 ml / ha.;
- ВII, spraying of plants: 1 st - in the full germination phase, 2 - in the phase of 6-5 leaves, 3rd - in 14
days after the second application, product consumption - 100 ml / ha, consumption of the working solution
- 200 l / ha.
Impact Aleox Agro on onion yield structure
Option | Number of bulbs, pcs / m2g | Diameter of the bulb, cm | The average weight of the bulb, g | Productivit y, t / ha | Yield increase | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dt / ha | % | |||||
Without treatment (control) | 74.0 | 5.8 | 109.7 | 81 | - | - |
Aleox Agro (50 ml / t / haAleox Agro (0.2 l / ha) (drip)) | 74.3 | 6.3 | 133.7 | 99 | 18 | 22,2 |
Aleox Agro (0.1 l / ha) (spraying) | 73.0 | 8.1 | 164.3 | 120 | 39 | 48.1 |