Other Vegetables

TOMATO "DAR ZAVOLZHYA"

RESULTS OF THE TRIALS, KRASNODAR TERRITORY, SEASON OF 2013


Effect of test products on productivity of tomatoes



Option Yield , dt / ha Increase to control
dt / ha %
Without treatment (control) 215.4 - -
Analog (dihydroquercetin) , 60 ml / ha 245.8 30.4 14.1
Aleox Agro , 60 ml / ha 254.6 39.2 18.2
Mean least difference 05 11.0 - -

Method of treatment and consumption rates of Aleox Agro: - spraying of plants: 1st - at the beginning of flowering of the first bunch, 2nd and 3rd - with an interval of 10 days. Consumption of product - 60 ml / ha, working fluid flow rate - 400 l / ha



The effect of the test product on tomato plant growth

Option Height of the plant, cm Weight of above-ground organs, g / plant Surface of ​​the leaves , dm
Raw Dry
Without treatment (control) 57.8 142.14 40.37 33.11
Analog (dihydroquercetin) , 60 ml / ha 65.4 162.18 48.49 36.14
Aleox Agro , 60 ml / ha 68.9 166.89 50.07 37.10
Mean least difference 05 2.2 5.14 1.58 1.23


Influence of test products on the formation of tomato fruits

Option The content in fruits Diameter, cm Fruit weight, g
Sugar ,% Vitamin C, mg / 100 g of raw substance
Without treatment (control) 5.9 79.82 3.1 25.4
Analog (dihydroquercetin) , 60 ml / ha 7.6 88.74 3.4 32.1
Aleox Agro , 60 ml / ha 8.1 94.21 3.6 33.0
Mean least difference 05 0.2 3.05 - -



GREEN PEPPER

RESULTS OF THE TRIALS, INDIA, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT, SEASON OF 2014

Agricultural practice

Experimental field was maintained according to the planned agricultural practice (pest control, weeding, fertilization, irrigation and etc.). Spraying of fertilizer Aleox Agro was performed at the stage of flowering of green pepper. The experiment took into account both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The definition of the latter was carried out visually. Upon completion of the trials, there were selected mature vegetables of market size and the yield was recorded by repeated counting

Since the spraying was done at the mid-growth stage of the crop / closer to the harvesting stage - the exact effect was not determined, but the fruit yield was %5 higher than the standard and %10 higher than the control. Can be carried out new trials in order to get result of actual effects of the product.



Yield and physical observation


Treatment Replication Physical state Yield
1 Aleox Agro 1 ml / l water 1R1T Good 140 kg / plot
2R1T Good 142 kg / plot
3R1T Good 139 kg / plot
T2 Standard 1ml / l 1R1T Good 135 kg / plot
2R1T Good 137 kg / plot
3R1T Good 133 kg / plot
T3 Control water spraying 1R1T Good 132 kg / plot
2R1T Good 128 kg / plot
3R1T Good 130 kg / plot



CHILLI

RESULTS OF THE TFIALS, INDIA, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT, SEASON OF 2014

CHILLI

Agricultural practice

Experimental field was maintained according to the planned agricultural practice (pest control, weeding, fertilization, irrigation and etc.). Spraying of fertilizer Aleox Agro was performed at the stage of flowering of green pepper. The experiment took into account both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The definition of the latter was carried out visually. Upon completion of the trials, there were selected mature vegetables of market size and the yield was recorded by repeated counting .

Since the spraying was done at the mid-growth stage of the crop / closer to the harvesting stage - the exact effect was not determined, but the fruit yield was %6 higher than the standard and %12 higher than the control. Can be carried out new trials in order to get result of actual effects of the product



Yield and physical observation


Treatment Replication Physical state Yield
ml / l water 1 Aleox Agro 1T 1R1T Good 62 kg / plot
2R1T Good 65 kg / plot
3R1T Good 60 kg / plot
T2 Standard 1R1T Good 55 kg / plot
2R1T Good 56 kg / plot
3R1T Good 58 kg / plot
T3 Control water spraying 1R1T Good 50 kg / plot
2R1T Good 48 kg / plot
3R1T Good 53 kg / plot



TOMATOES

RESULTS OF THE TRIALS, INDIA, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT, SEASON OF 2014

TOMATO

Agricultural practice

Experimental field was maintained according to the planned agricultural practice (pest control, weeding, fertilization, irrigation and etc.). Spraying of fertilizer Aleox Agro was performed at the stage of flowering of tomato. The experiment took into account both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The definition of the latter was carried out visually. Upon completion of the trials, there were selected mature vegetables of market size and the yield was recorded by repeated counting

Since the spraying was done at the mid-growth stage of the crop / closer to the harvesting stage - the exact effect was not determined, but the fruit yield was %6 higher than the standard and %15 higher than the control. Can be carried out new trials in order to get result of actual effects of the product.



Yield and physical observation


Treatment Replication Physical state Yield
ml / l water 1 Aleox Agro 1T 1R1T Good 62 kg / plot
2R1T Good 65 kg / plot
3R1T Good 60 kg / plot
T2 Standard 1R1T Good 55 kg / plot
2R1T Good 56 kg / plot
3R1T Good 58 kg / plot
T3 Control water spraying 1R1T Good 50 kg / plot
2R1T Good 48 kg / plot
3R1T Good 53 kg / plot



EARLY ONION «SPENISH»

RESULTS OF THE TRIALS, ASTRAKHAN REGION, SEASON OF 2017

TOMATO

Method of treatment and consumption rates of product:

- Control, without the use of Aleox Agro;
- BI, with irrigation water through the drip irrigation system: 1 st - in the full germination phase, 2 - in the phase of 6-5 leaves, 3rd - 14 days after the second application, product consumption - 200 ml / ha.;
- ВII, spraying of plants: 1 st - in the full germination phase, 2 - in the phase of 6-5 leaves, 3rd - in 14 days after the second application, product consumption - 100 ml / ha, consumption of the working solution
- 200 l / ha.



Impact Aleox Agro on onion yield structure


Option Number of bulbs, pcs / m2g Diameter of the bulb, cm The average weight of the bulb, g Productivit y, t / ha Yield increase
dt / ha %
Without treatment (control) 74.0 5.8 109.7 81 - -
Aleox Agro (50 ml / t / haAleox Agro (0.2 l / ha) (drip)) 74.3 6.3 133.7 99 18 22,2
Aleox Agro (0.1 l / ha) (spraying) 73.0 8.1 164.3 120 39 48.1